Trump Sues DOJ: $100 Million for Political Persecution
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 104 days ago
**Persecution's Price: Trump to Sue DOJ for $100 Million**
In a bold move, former President Donald Trump is launching a legal battle against the Department of Justice, seeking $100 million in damages stemming from the controversial FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago estate back in August 2022.
Trump's legal team alleges that the raid was not just a standard law enforcement operation but rather an act of "political persecution" aimed at undermining his stature in the political arena.
The memo submitted by Trump's attorneys outlines their belief that the actions taken by the FBI and the Justice Department were marked by a clear intent to harm Trump politically, effectively painting the raid as an unjustified overreach of authority.
Following the raid, Special Counsel Jack Smith brought forth 37 felony counts against Trump, including charges ranging from willful retention of national defense information to conspiracy to obstruct justice.
Nevertheless, unwavering in his stance, Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts, maintaining that the prosecution was fundamentally flawed.
Recently, a worthwhile turn: U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Smith’s case against Trump, questioning the legality of Smith's appointment and funding under the Constitution's Appointments Clause.
This ruling has emboldened Trump's legal team to move forward with their lawsuit, asserting that the Justice Department's actions violate the principles of due process.
According to Trump attorney Daniel Epstein, this lawsuit stands as a significant effort not just to vindicate Trump, but to uphold the rule of law for all Americans who may feel wronged by government actions.
Epstein elaborated that the alleged misconduct conducted during the Mar-a-Lago raid is an affront to every citizen, standing against the values of fairness and integrity expected from government entities.
The notice to sue underscores accusations that the Justice Department's actions were inconsistent with established protocols and deeply rooted in a partisan agenda aimed solely at damaging Trump’s political ambitions.
Anticipating a response, the DOJ now has 180 days to address the notice before the case transitions to federal court in Florida.
As the political landscape remains starkly divided, this lawsuit embodies a growing sentiment among Trump's supporters that the former president is a target of a biased system that treats political adversaries with impropriety.
In what could become a landmark case, the outcome may have far-reaching implications for the standard of justice and the future of political accountability in the United States.
Trump's ongoing fight is not just about personal vindication, but resonates with many Americans who view the mishandling of this case as indicative of larger challenges to the integrity of our democratic institutions.
Sources:
discernreport.com
lewrockwell.com
100percentfedup.com
In a bold move, former President Donald Trump is launching a legal battle against the Department of Justice, seeking $100 million in damages stemming from the controversial FBI raid on his Mar-a-Lago estate back in August 2022.
Trump's legal team alleges that the raid was not just a standard law enforcement operation but rather an act of "political persecution" aimed at undermining his stature in the political arena.
The memo submitted by Trump's attorneys outlines their belief that the actions taken by the FBI and the Justice Department were marked by a clear intent to harm Trump politically, effectively painting the raid as an unjustified overreach of authority.
Following the raid, Special Counsel Jack Smith brought forth 37 felony counts against Trump, including charges ranging from willful retention of national defense information to conspiracy to obstruct justice.
Nevertheless, unwavering in his stance, Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts, maintaining that the prosecution was fundamentally flawed.
Recently, a worthwhile turn: U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Smith’s case against Trump, questioning the legality of Smith's appointment and funding under the Constitution's Appointments Clause.
This ruling has emboldened Trump's legal team to move forward with their lawsuit, asserting that the Justice Department's actions violate the principles of due process.
According to Trump attorney Daniel Epstein, this lawsuit stands as a significant effort not just to vindicate Trump, but to uphold the rule of law for all Americans who may feel wronged by government actions.
Epstein elaborated that the alleged misconduct conducted during the Mar-a-Lago raid is an affront to every citizen, standing against the values of fairness and integrity expected from government entities.
The notice to sue underscores accusations that the Justice Department's actions were inconsistent with established protocols and deeply rooted in a partisan agenda aimed solely at damaging Trump’s political ambitions.
Anticipating a response, the DOJ now has 180 days to address the notice before the case transitions to federal court in Florida.
As the political landscape remains starkly divided, this lawsuit embodies a growing sentiment among Trump's supporters that the former president is a target of a biased system that treats political adversaries with impropriety.
In what could become a landmark case, the outcome may have far-reaching implications for the standard of justice and the future of political accountability in the United States.
Trump's ongoing fight is not just about personal vindication, but resonates with many Americans who view the mishandling of this case as indicative of larger challenges to the integrity of our democratic institutions.
Sources:
discernreport.com
lewrockwell.com
100percentfedup.com
Latest News