Kamala Harris' Border Hawk Image: Deception or Strategy?
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 105 days ago
**Deception Unveiled: Kamala Harris Attempts to Rebrand as a Border Hawk**
In a bold move that has raised eyebrows among political analysts and voters alike, Vice President Kamala Harris is making a concerted effort to reshape her image regarding border security.
This attempt comes at a time when voters have a long memory, particularly concerning her record on immigration policy during her tenure as a U.S. senator and her role as “border czar” in the Biden administration.
Recent advertisements from her campaign boast of her commitment to “fixing the border” and increasing Border Patrol personnel.
However, former Border Patrol Chief Rodney Scott, who served during both the Trump and Biden administrations, has expressed skepticism about Harris' claims.
Scott warns voters to remain vigilant, characterizing her messaging as “smoke and mirrors.”
He emphasizes that her promises to enhance border security are likely aimed at streamlining the process for illegal immigration rather than genuinely enforcing the law.
“Look at her track record,” Scott advises. “When you dive in and look at her platform, it’s very, very consistent.”
Indeed, Harris has shifted from advocating for the decriminalization of illegal border crossings to presenting herself as a border hawk, which many argue is a desperate attempt to win over skeptical voters.
During her previous campaign for the presidency, she was vocally supportive of measures that critics contended would weaken border security, earning her an F- rating from NumbersUSA, a group that champions stricter immigration policies.
Furthermore, as Scott points out, the Biden-Harris administration has redirected federal resources away from enforcement and into processing illegal migrants more swiftly.
While Harris attempts to claim a more robust stance on immigration, polling data reveals that a significant portion of the electorate still views her as an advocate for “open borders,” a perception that could hinder her campaign’s effectiveness.
As Harris amps up her rhetoric, her choice of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as a running mate raises further concerns.
Walz has a troubling history with immigration as well, supporting policies favorable to undocumented migrants, including state-funded health care and driver’s licenses for those in the country illegally.
With both Harris and Walz leaning towards more lenient immigration policies, Americans are left questioning the authenticity of Harris' sudden shift in narrative.
The bottom line is clear: actions speak louder than words.
As Harris struggles to convince the nation of her new approach, it remains to be seen whether voters will be swayed by her latest campaign promises or hold her accountable for her past.
As the 2024 election looms, it’s crucial for the American public to scrutinize the motivations behind these last-minute transformations in the Democratic party’s immigration stance.
Sources:
americafirstreport.com
rumble.com
twitchy.com
In a bold move that has raised eyebrows among political analysts and voters alike, Vice President Kamala Harris is making a concerted effort to reshape her image regarding border security.
This attempt comes at a time when voters have a long memory, particularly concerning her record on immigration policy during her tenure as a U.S. senator and her role as “border czar” in the Biden administration.
Recent advertisements from her campaign boast of her commitment to “fixing the border” and increasing Border Patrol personnel.
However, former Border Patrol Chief Rodney Scott, who served during both the Trump and Biden administrations, has expressed skepticism about Harris' claims.
Scott warns voters to remain vigilant, characterizing her messaging as “smoke and mirrors.”
He emphasizes that her promises to enhance border security are likely aimed at streamlining the process for illegal immigration rather than genuinely enforcing the law.
“Look at her track record,” Scott advises. “When you dive in and look at her platform, it’s very, very consistent.”
Indeed, Harris has shifted from advocating for the decriminalization of illegal border crossings to presenting herself as a border hawk, which many argue is a desperate attempt to win over skeptical voters.
During her previous campaign for the presidency, she was vocally supportive of measures that critics contended would weaken border security, earning her an F- rating from NumbersUSA, a group that champions stricter immigration policies.
Furthermore, as Scott points out, the Biden-Harris administration has redirected federal resources away from enforcement and into processing illegal migrants more swiftly.
While Harris attempts to claim a more robust stance on immigration, polling data reveals that a significant portion of the electorate still views her as an advocate for “open borders,” a perception that could hinder her campaign’s effectiveness.
As Harris amps up her rhetoric, her choice of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as a running mate raises further concerns.
Walz has a troubling history with immigration as well, supporting policies favorable to undocumented migrants, including state-funded health care and driver’s licenses for those in the country illegally.
With both Harris and Walz leaning towards more lenient immigration policies, Americans are left questioning the authenticity of Harris' sudden shift in narrative.
The bottom line is clear: actions speak louder than words.
As Harris struggles to convince the nation of her new approach, it remains to be seen whether voters will be swayed by her latest campaign promises or hold her accountable for her past.
As the 2024 election looms, it’s crucial for the American public to scrutinize the motivations behind these last-minute transformations in the Democratic party’s immigration stance.
Sources:
americafirstreport.com
rumble.com
twitchy.com
Latest News