Judicial Corruption Threatens Our Second Amendment Rights
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 105 days ago
**Corruption Unveiled: Judicial Manipulation Targeting Second Amendment Rights**
In a shocking exposé, revelations have surfaced regarding the manipulation of judicial processes within the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that undermine the Second Amendment.
The focus of this scandal centers on the Bianchi case, which involves Maryland’s controversial ban on so-called “assault weapons.”
Alarmingly, dissenting judges in the Fourth Circuit have asserted that the majority reached a pro-Second Amendment decision late last year.
However, they allege that anti-gun judges intentionally delayed the release of their ruling to suppress a favorable outcome for gun rights advocates.
In a rarely-used procedural tactic, the court sat on a pro-Second Amendment ruling for over a year, only to allow a subsequent panel to issue an anti-gun decision in another case, ultimately leading to rehearing the Bianchi case.
This kind of judicial maneuvering raises serious concerns about transparency and fair trial processes in critical Second Amendment cases.
The dissenting judges exposed this behavior, which many gun rights advocates have long suspected, validating concerns that parts of our judicial system are being weaponized against constitutional rights.
It is particularly disconcerting that the majority opinion on the Bianchi case brazenly contradicts long-standing Supreme Court precedents, including the important Heller decision, which upheld individual gun rights.
Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and advocate for gun rights, has been vocal about these tactics and emphasizes the need for vigilant advocacy within the judicial sphere.
The manipulation of the Fourth Circuit highlights the complex challenges faced by supporters of the Second Amendment.
Smith notes that the battle for gun rights is taking place not just in the courts, but also in the court of public opinion, as awareness of these underhanded tactics becomes essential to fighting for constitutional freedoms.
The distressing reality is that those in power appear willing to go to great lengths to stifle dissenting opinions and infringe upon the rights guaranteed by our founding documents.
As the attention surrounding the Bianchi case grows, it serves as a critical reminder for Americans to remain engaged and informed about efforts to protect their rights, ensuring that the fundamental principles of justice and liberty are upheld.
Moving forward, it is crucial for advocates of the Second Amendment to stay organized and united in their push against manipulative strategies that threaten their rights.
With these revelations coming to light, Americans must remain steadfast in their commitment to protecting constitutional liberties for future generations.
Sources:
pjmedia.com
ammoland.com
cnn.com
In a shocking exposé, revelations have surfaced regarding the manipulation of judicial processes within the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that undermine the Second Amendment.
The focus of this scandal centers on the Bianchi case, which involves Maryland’s controversial ban on so-called “assault weapons.”
Alarmingly, dissenting judges in the Fourth Circuit have asserted that the majority reached a pro-Second Amendment decision late last year.
However, they allege that anti-gun judges intentionally delayed the release of their ruling to suppress a favorable outcome for gun rights advocates.
In a rarely-used procedural tactic, the court sat on a pro-Second Amendment ruling for over a year, only to allow a subsequent panel to issue an anti-gun decision in another case, ultimately leading to rehearing the Bianchi case.
This kind of judicial maneuvering raises serious concerns about transparency and fair trial processes in critical Second Amendment cases.
The dissenting judges exposed this behavior, which many gun rights advocates have long suspected, validating concerns that parts of our judicial system are being weaponized against constitutional rights.
It is particularly disconcerting that the majority opinion on the Bianchi case brazenly contradicts long-standing Supreme Court precedents, including the important Heller decision, which upheld individual gun rights.
Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney and advocate for gun rights, has been vocal about these tactics and emphasizes the need for vigilant advocacy within the judicial sphere.
The manipulation of the Fourth Circuit highlights the complex challenges faced by supporters of the Second Amendment.
Smith notes that the battle for gun rights is taking place not just in the courts, but also in the court of public opinion, as awareness of these underhanded tactics becomes essential to fighting for constitutional freedoms.
The distressing reality is that those in power appear willing to go to great lengths to stifle dissenting opinions and infringe upon the rights guaranteed by our founding documents.
As the attention surrounding the Bianchi case grows, it serves as a critical reminder for Americans to remain engaged and informed about efforts to protect their rights, ensuring that the fundamental principles of justice and liberty are upheld.
Moving forward, it is crucial for advocates of the Second Amendment to stay organized and united in their push against manipulative strategies that threaten their rights.
With these revelations coming to light, Americans must remain steadfast in their commitment to protecting constitutional liberties for future generations.
Sources:
pjmedia.com
ammoland.com
cnn.com
Latest News