Justice for Ashli Babbitt: DOJ Faces Reckoning
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 106 days ago
Judge Orders Accountability for Ashli Babbitt's Death as Biden DOJ Faces Legal Scrutiny
In a significant development, a federal judge has ordered the Biden administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) to respond to wrongful death charges filed by the family of Ashli Babbitt.
Babbitt, a 35-year-old Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer during the events of January 6, 2021.
The order from Judge Ana Reyes, who was appointed by President Biden, mandates that the DOJ provide a response regarding allegations of assault and battery, negligence, and wrongful death in a case seeking $30 million in damages.
The officer involved, Michael Byrd, has yet to face any criminal charges or disciplinary action from the Capitol Police, despite the DOJ clearing him of wrongdoing shortly after the incident.
Byrd shot Babbitt as she attempted to enter the Speaker's Lobby through a broken glass window, and his actions have drawn scrutiny for their carelessness. The Judicial Watch lawsuit states that Byrd failed to properly assess the threat posed by Babbitt, who was unarmed and above all, did not warrant deadly force.
Critics have noted that Byrd's own admission of firing without assessing Babbitt's intentions raises questions about the justification for his actions.
The lawsuit highlights not only the tragic loss of life but also the systemic failures in training and accountability within the Capitol Police, suggesting that Byrd's behavior could have been better managed to prevent such a deadly outcome.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton emphasized the need for accountability, stating, “Ashli Babbitt and her family deserve justice for her wrongful death on January 6th." He criticized the Biden DOJ for allegedly attempting to evade responsibility and stifling a full hearing of the facts in court.
The case has created a stir, with calls for a thorough investigation into the actions of law enforcement during the Capitol events. Critics of the current administration have pointed out the stark contrast in how the cases surrounding January 6 defendants and related issues seem to be handled, drawing further attention to the politicization of the Justice Department.
As the DOJ rushes to address this lawsuit, the questions surrounding the tragic death of Ashli Babbitt resonate deeply with many Americans who are demanding accountability and justice. The implications of this case extend beyond the courtroom, touching upon broader themes of governance, law enforcement accountability, and public trust in the administration.
With the response deadline looming, all eyes are on the Biden administration as it grapples with this critical issue, one that has sparked national conversations about the rights of individuals and the responsibilities of those in power.
Sources:
slaynews.com
nbcnews.com
voanews.com
In a significant development, a federal judge has ordered the Biden administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) to respond to wrongful death charges filed by the family of Ashli Babbitt.
Babbitt, a 35-year-old Air Force veteran, was fatally shot by a Capitol Police officer during the events of January 6, 2021.
The order from Judge Ana Reyes, who was appointed by President Biden, mandates that the DOJ provide a response regarding allegations of assault and battery, negligence, and wrongful death in a case seeking $30 million in damages.
The officer involved, Michael Byrd, has yet to face any criminal charges or disciplinary action from the Capitol Police, despite the DOJ clearing him of wrongdoing shortly after the incident.
Byrd shot Babbitt as she attempted to enter the Speaker's Lobby through a broken glass window, and his actions have drawn scrutiny for their carelessness. The Judicial Watch lawsuit states that Byrd failed to properly assess the threat posed by Babbitt, who was unarmed and above all, did not warrant deadly force.
Critics have noted that Byrd's own admission of firing without assessing Babbitt's intentions raises questions about the justification for his actions.
The lawsuit highlights not only the tragic loss of life but also the systemic failures in training and accountability within the Capitol Police, suggesting that Byrd's behavior could have been better managed to prevent such a deadly outcome.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton emphasized the need for accountability, stating, “Ashli Babbitt and her family deserve justice for her wrongful death on January 6th." He criticized the Biden DOJ for allegedly attempting to evade responsibility and stifling a full hearing of the facts in court.
The case has created a stir, with calls for a thorough investigation into the actions of law enforcement during the Capitol events. Critics of the current administration have pointed out the stark contrast in how the cases surrounding January 6 defendants and related issues seem to be handled, drawing further attention to the politicization of the Justice Department.
As the DOJ rushes to address this lawsuit, the questions surrounding the tragic death of Ashli Babbitt resonate deeply with many Americans who are demanding accountability and justice. The implications of this case extend beyond the courtroom, touching upon broader themes of governance, law enforcement accountability, and public trust in the administration.
With the response deadline looming, all eyes are on the Biden administration as it grapples with this critical issue, one that has sparked national conversations about the rights of individuals and the responsibilities of those in power.
Sources:
slaynews.com
nbcnews.com
voanews.com
Latest News