Biden's Surveillance State: Targeting Americans Based on Beliefs
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 111 days ago
**Surveillance State: Biden Administration’s Disturbing Targeting Strategies**
In a remarkable revelation, the Biden administration's troubling tactics of domestic surveillance are drawing criticism from various quarters, with increasing concerns about their motivations.
Sonya LaBosco, the head of the Air Marshal National Council, recently disclosed that air marshals have been reassigned from their traditional duties to monitor individuals based on political affiliations rather than any genuine security concerns.
Notably, former U.S. Representative Tulsi Gabbard has become a key figure in this dialogue, reportedly under surveillance while traveling due to her recent political shift away from the Democratic Party.
Gabbard's monitoring is executed through the TSA's "Quiet Skies" program, which was originally intended to identify potential terrorist threats on commercial flights.
According to whistleblower accounts, air marshals now spend their time tracking passengers linked to the events of January 6, 2021, regardless of their actual involvement in any wrongdoing.
LaBosco expressed alarm over how this program has morphed into a tool for political targeting rather than preserving public safety.
Individuals who merely happened to be in the vicinity of the Capitol during the protests are being scrutinized, including those engaged in entirely innocuous activities.
Concerns are mounting regarding the broader implications of this surveillance approach, which could set a dangerous precedent where the government monitors innocent citizens simply for their political beliefs.
Republicans are raising red flags about this extensive overreach, citing an alarming trend towards a more authoritarian state under the current administration.
The situation underscores a stark contrast in how the current Democratic leadership protects the freedoms of some while simultaneously infringing on others, especially those who dare to challenge the status quo.
Civil liberties advocates are sounding the alarm, suggesting that if this unchecked surveillance continues, it could stifle dissent and undermine the very fabric of American democracy.
As the nation gears up for an intense election season, the call for transparency and accountability grows louder, and many Americans are understandably uneasy about the lengths to which their government may go to silence political dissent.
This intrusion into the private lives of citizens, often veiled under national security concerns, raises pressing questions about governmental accountability and the respect for individual rights in today's political climate.
Sources:
dallasexpress.com
rumble.com
lifenews.com
In a remarkable revelation, the Biden administration's troubling tactics of domestic surveillance are drawing criticism from various quarters, with increasing concerns about their motivations.
Sonya LaBosco, the head of the Air Marshal National Council, recently disclosed that air marshals have been reassigned from their traditional duties to monitor individuals based on political affiliations rather than any genuine security concerns.
Notably, former U.S. Representative Tulsi Gabbard has become a key figure in this dialogue, reportedly under surveillance while traveling due to her recent political shift away from the Democratic Party.
Gabbard's monitoring is executed through the TSA's "Quiet Skies" program, which was originally intended to identify potential terrorist threats on commercial flights.
According to whistleblower accounts, air marshals now spend their time tracking passengers linked to the events of January 6, 2021, regardless of their actual involvement in any wrongdoing.
LaBosco expressed alarm over how this program has morphed into a tool for political targeting rather than preserving public safety.
Individuals who merely happened to be in the vicinity of the Capitol during the protests are being scrutinized, including those engaged in entirely innocuous activities.
Concerns are mounting regarding the broader implications of this surveillance approach, which could set a dangerous precedent where the government monitors innocent citizens simply for their political beliefs.
Republicans are raising red flags about this extensive overreach, citing an alarming trend towards a more authoritarian state under the current administration.
The situation underscores a stark contrast in how the current Democratic leadership protects the freedoms of some while simultaneously infringing on others, especially those who dare to challenge the status quo.
Civil liberties advocates are sounding the alarm, suggesting that if this unchecked surveillance continues, it could stifle dissent and undermine the very fabric of American democracy.
As the nation gears up for an intense election season, the call for transparency and accountability grows louder, and many Americans are understandably uneasy about the lengths to which their government may go to silence political dissent.
This intrusion into the private lives of citizens, often veiled under national security concerns, raises pressing questions about governmental accountability and the respect for individual rights in today's political climate.
Sources:
dallasexpress.com
rumble.com
lifenews.com
Latest News