Public Doubts Secret Service's Ability to Protect Candidates
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 114 days ago
**Disturbing Findings on Secret Service's Efficacy in Protecting Presidential Candidates**
A recent poll has uncovered troubling sentiments among the American public regarding the effectiveness of the United States Secret Service in safeguarding presidential candidates.
In light of the recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, confidence in the agency appears to be waning.
According to an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted between July 25 and July 29, only 30% of Americans say they feel "extremely" or "very confident" that the Secret Service can protect presidential candidates from violence ahead of the November election.
This skepticism is particularly pronounced among Republicans and Independents.
Only 22% of Republicans and a mere 21% of Independents expressed strong confidence in the Secret Service's ability to carry out its protective duties.
In stark contrast, 43% of Democrats voiced confidence in the agency's effectiveness.
Further exacerbating concerns, the poll indicated that just 36% of Americans are "extremely" or "very confident" that the Department of Homeland Security will conduct a thorough investigation into the thwarted attack on Trump.
Interestingly, public sentiment appears to correlate concerns about political division with the violence observed during the assassination attempt.
An overwhelming 78% of respondents attributed a significant degree of blame to the increasing polarization within U.S. politics.
Moreover, 72% of participants placed responsibility on the Secret Service for the security lapse that allowed a gunman to open fire at Trump's rally in Pennsylvania last month.
The incident led to tragic consequences, resulting in the death of one individual and injuries to two others.
In response to this alarming poll, the resignation of Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle on July 23, following her unsatisfactory testimony before Congress on the matter, raises additional questions about the agency's oversight and accountability.
Acting Director Ronald Rowe has since taken the helm, as the Secret Service faces intense scrutiny over its handling of candidate security.
This alarming landscape underscores growing public concern about the safety of political figures in a time of heightened tensions, putting further pressure on federal agencies tasked with their protection.
As American citizens reflect on these findings, the imperative for enhanced security measures and a reassessment of current protocols has never been more pronounced.
Voters will undoubtedly be watching closely as we approach the election, calling for a system that ensures the safety of all candidates, regardless of their political affiliations.
Sources:
slaynews.com
thegatewaypundit.com
dailycallernewsfoundation.org
A recent poll has uncovered troubling sentiments among the American public regarding the effectiveness of the United States Secret Service in safeguarding presidential candidates.
In light of the recent assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, confidence in the agency appears to be waning.
According to an Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted between July 25 and July 29, only 30% of Americans say they feel "extremely" or "very confident" that the Secret Service can protect presidential candidates from violence ahead of the November election.
This skepticism is particularly pronounced among Republicans and Independents.
Only 22% of Republicans and a mere 21% of Independents expressed strong confidence in the Secret Service's ability to carry out its protective duties.
In stark contrast, 43% of Democrats voiced confidence in the agency's effectiveness.
Further exacerbating concerns, the poll indicated that just 36% of Americans are "extremely" or "very confident" that the Department of Homeland Security will conduct a thorough investigation into the thwarted attack on Trump.
Interestingly, public sentiment appears to correlate concerns about political division with the violence observed during the assassination attempt.
An overwhelming 78% of respondents attributed a significant degree of blame to the increasing polarization within U.S. politics.
Moreover, 72% of participants placed responsibility on the Secret Service for the security lapse that allowed a gunman to open fire at Trump's rally in Pennsylvania last month.
The incident led to tragic consequences, resulting in the death of one individual and injuries to two others.
In response to this alarming poll, the resignation of Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle on July 23, following her unsatisfactory testimony before Congress on the matter, raises additional questions about the agency's oversight and accountability.
Acting Director Ronald Rowe has since taken the helm, as the Secret Service faces intense scrutiny over its handling of candidate security.
This alarming landscape underscores growing public concern about the safety of political figures in a time of heightened tensions, putting further pressure on federal agencies tasked with their protection.
As American citizens reflect on these findings, the imperative for enhanced security measures and a reassessment of current protocols has never been more pronounced.
Voters will undoubtedly be watching closely as we approach the election, calling for a system that ensures the safety of all candidates, regardless of their political affiliations.
Sources:
slaynews.com
thegatewaypundit.com
dailycallernewsfoundation.org
Latest News