Trump Assassination Attempt Raises Major FBI Accountability Questions
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 83 days ago
**Astonishing Revelation: Trump Targeted in Assassination Attempt, FBI Confusion Continues**
In a shocking twist to the story of the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, the FBI has confirmed that a bullet struck Trump during the tragic event at his Pennsylvania rally on July 13.
This revelation comes amid ongoing scrutiny of FBI Director Christopher Wray's handling of the investigation. Despite earlier ambiguity, the FBI acknowledged that the bullet which made contact with Trump’s ear was either whole or fragmented.
The incident, which resulted in the tragic death of one rallygoer and injuries to others, has raised serious questions not only about the investigation but also about the motivations behind this failed attack on a leading political figure.
Trump reacted strongly to Wray's initial testimony before Congress, where he suggested it remained unclear if Trump had been shot at all, leaving many to wonder about the integrity of the investigation. In an emphatic post on Truth Social, Trump asserted, "No, it was, unfortunately, a bullet that hit my ear, and hit it hard. There was no glass, there was no shrapnel."
Adding his voice to the fray, Texas Representative Ronny Jackson, who served as Trump’s physician during his presidency, disputed Wray's statement in a letter to Congress. Jackson affirmed that there was no evidence to support the claim that something other than a bullet struck Trump. He urged Congress to correct the record, emphasizing the need for clarity in such a serious matter.
As the FBI continues to sift through bullet fragments from the scene, Americans are left to question whether the agency can be trusted to handle high-stakes investigations involving political figures.
In the wake of the assassination attempt, Trump has been vocal in his criticism of Wray, asserting that the director's lack of clarity leaves doubt about the FBI's capabilities. He has vowed to dismiss Wray if he regains the presidency, a promise that resonates with many supporters who have long viewed the FBI as politically compromised.
While the details of the investigation are still unfolding, the implications of this assassination attempt, coupled with the FBI’s perceived missteps, offer a sobering reminder of the precarious environment in which political discourse takes place today.
As Trump takes the stage at his campaign rallies, he asserts that he "took a bullet for democracy," further energizing his base and underscoring the dedication to his cause amidst escalating political tensions.
With the 2024 election on the horizon, this incident represents more than just an attack on one individual; it highlights the broader struggles facing conservative values and the challenges they continue to confront in a divisive political landscape.
Sources:
rumble.com
abcnews.go.com
In a shocking twist to the story of the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, the FBI has confirmed that a bullet struck Trump during the tragic event at his Pennsylvania rally on July 13.
This revelation comes amid ongoing scrutiny of FBI Director Christopher Wray's handling of the investigation. Despite earlier ambiguity, the FBI acknowledged that the bullet which made contact with Trump’s ear was either whole or fragmented.
The incident, which resulted in the tragic death of one rallygoer and injuries to others, has raised serious questions not only about the investigation but also about the motivations behind this failed attack on a leading political figure.
Trump reacted strongly to Wray's initial testimony before Congress, where he suggested it remained unclear if Trump had been shot at all, leaving many to wonder about the integrity of the investigation. In an emphatic post on Truth Social, Trump asserted, "No, it was, unfortunately, a bullet that hit my ear, and hit it hard. There was no glass, there was no shrapnel."
Adding his voice to the fray, Texas Representative Ronny Jackson, who served as Trump’s physician during his presidency, disputed Wray's statement in a letter to Congress. Jackson affirmed that there was no evidence to support the claim that something other than a bullet struck Trump. He urged Congress to correct the record, emphasizing the need for clarity in such a serious matter.
As the FBI continues to sift through bullet fragments from the scene, Americans are left to question whether the agency can be trusted to handle high-stakes investigations involving political figures.
In the wake of the assassination attempt, Trump has been vocal in his criticism of Wray, asserting that the director's lack of clarity leaves doubt about the FBI's capabilities. He has vowed to dismiss Wray if he regains the presidency, a promise that resonates with many supporters who have long viewed the FBI as politically compromised.
While the details of the investigation are still unfolding, the implications of this assassination attempt, coupled with the FBI’s perceived missteps, offer a sobering reminder of the precarious environment in which political discourse takes place today.
As Trump takes the stage at his campaign rallies, he asserts that he "took a bullet for democracy," further energizing his base and underscoring the dedication to his cause amidst escalating political tensions.
With the 2024 election on the horizon, this incident represents more than just an attack on one individual; it highlights the broader struggles facing conservative values and the challenges they continue to confront in a divisive political landscape.
Sources:
rumble.com
abcnews.go.com
Latest News