CDC Vaccine Mandate Repeal Guards Parental Rights, Freedom
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 1 day ago
Vaccine Mandate Repeal a Major Victory for Parental Rights and Medical Freedom
In a significant policy shift, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has voted to end the long-standing mandate for the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth.
This decision marks the end of a 34-year coercive practice that pressured parents into vaccinating their newborns against a virus that poses minimal risk to healthy infants.
For decades, many parents felt compelled to comply with hospital policies driven by profit rather than genuine public health needs.
The decision to mandate hepatitis B vaccination within hours of a baby's birth was based on a flawed premise: protecting adults who were reluctant to receive the vaccine by targeting infants who had virtually no chance of contracting the disease.
Since the mandate was enacted in 1991, approximately 3.6 million newborns each year received this unnecessary vaccine, which was originally justified as a key strategy to boost adult vaccination rates.
This policy shift is not just about altering a vaccine schedule; it exposes the troubling dynamics of a medical system that often prioritizes corporate interests over individual patient health.
Concerns regarding the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been largely overlooked.
Critics have pointed out that the vaccine contains a dangerously high level of aluminum, an adjuvant known to be linked to autoimmune and neurological disorders.
The FDA guidelines stipulate a maximum safe limit for aluminum injection, yet the hepatitis B vaccine exceeds this threshold by more than ten times.
This reversal gives families a crucial win in the fight for informed consent and personal medical freedom.
It reflects a growing movement among Americans demanding transparency and accountability from health authorities.
As the CDC faces increased scrutiny over its practices, parents are rightfully questioning the safety and necessity of numerous vaccines mandated for their children.
The decision to repeal the hepatitis B vaccine mandate for newborns is a step toward reclaiming parental authority over healthcare choices.
It serves as a powerful reminder that health decisions should be based on individual risk assessments rather than pressures from pharmaceutical giants or government mandates.
With such critical changes taking place, one can only hope that this will inspire further scrutiny and reform within the public health landscape, ultimately prioritizing the well-being of children over corporate profits.
Sources:
naturalnews.com
naturalnews.com
In a significant policy shift, the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has voted to end the long-standing mandate for the hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth.
This decision marks the end of a 34-year coercive practice that pressured parents into vaccinating their newborns against a virus that poses minimal risk to healthy infants.
For decades, many parents felt compelled to comply with hospital policies driven by profit rather than genuine public health needs.
The decision to mandate hepatitis B vaccination within hours of a baby's birth was based on a flawed premise: protecting adults who were reluctant to receive the vaccine by targeting infants who had virtually no chance of contracting the disease.
Since the mandate was enacted in 1991, approximately 3.6 million newborns each year received this unnecessary vaccine, which was originally justified as a key strategy to boost adult vaccination rates.
This policy shift is not just about altering a vaccine schedule; it exposes the troubling dynamics of a medical system that often prioritizes corporate interests over individual patient health.
Concerns regarding the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been largely overlooked.
Critics have pointed out that the vaccine contains a dangerously high level of aluminum, an adjuvant known to be linked to autoimmune and neurological disorders.
The FDA guidelines stipulate a maximum safe limit for aluminum injection, yet the hepatitis B vaccine exceeds this threshold by more than ten times.
This reversal gives families a crucial win in the fight for informed consent and personal medical freedom.
It reflects a growing movement among Americans demanding transparency and accountability from health authorities.
As the CDC faces increased scrutiny over its practices, parents are rightfully questioning the safety and necessity of numerous vaccines mandated for their children.
The decision to repeal the hepatitis B vaccine mandate for newborns is a step toward reclaiming parental authority over healthcare choices.
It serves as a powerful reminder that health decisions should be based on individual risk assessments rather than pressures from pharmaceutical giants or government mandates.
With such critical changes taking place, one can only hope that this will inspire further scrutiny and reform within the public health landscape, ultimately prioritizing the well-being of children over corporate profits.
Sources:
naturalnews.com
naturalnews.com
Latest News