Columbia's Radical Activism Funded by Taxpayer Dollars
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 days ago
**Outrage: Taxpayer Dollars Support Columbia's Radical Activism**
In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that Columbia University is fanning the flames of radical activism with taxpayer money.
Prominent among the faculty participating in pro-Hamas protests is neuropsychologist Jennifer J. Manly.
She was spotted obstructing university operations alongside other professors in a demonstration against the removal of unauthorized encampments promoting anti-Semitic sentiment.
This isn't just a case of ideological misalignment; it raises serious concerns about the integrity of academic funding in America.
Manly's academic pursuits align closely with her activism, relying on a controversial thesis that attributes brain health issues in racial minorities to systemic oppression rather than biological factors.
Critics have labeled her conclusions as speculative and lacking in scientific rigor—a sentiment echoed by conservative commentators who are increasingly concerned about the politicization of research.
The situation grows more egregious when you consider the scale of taxpayer funding involved.
Over the last twenty years, Manly has received grants exceeding $100 million from federal sources like the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Just recently, the NIH allocated nearly $700,000 to a project linking perceived racism with dementia risks, a point that raises eyebrows among many who question the direction of federal funding under successive regimes.
The Trump administration's recent move to revoke federal financial support to institutions that tolerate anti-Semitism is a strong step toward accountability.
By putting the spotlight on institutions like Columbia, the administration aims to dismantle the funding pipeline that sustains radicalized academic agendas.
In a time when hateful rhetoric towards Jewish communities is unsettling, it's critical that federal resources are not used to validate or promote such ideologies.
The administration has vowed to continue its efforts to investigate and eliminate funding from institutions that promote activism masquerading as scholarship.
Clearly, the focus must return to authentic research that serves the public good.
As we navigate this chaotic landscape, it is imperative to scrutinize how taxpayer dollars are being utilized in academia and to ensure that funding reflects American values of integrity and respect for all citizens.
Sources:
city-journal.org
theepochtimes.com
toddstarnes.com
In a shocking revelation, it has come to light that Columbia University is fanning the flames of radical activism with taxpayer money.
Prominent among the faculty participating in pro-Hamas protests is neuropsychologist Jennifer J. Manly.
She was spotted obstructing university operations alongside other professors in a demonstration against the removal of unauthorized encampments promoting anti-Semitic sentiment.
This isn't just a case of ideological misalignment; it raises serious concerns about the integrity of academic funding in America.
Manly's academic pursuits align closely with her activism, relying on a controversial thesis that attributes brain health issues in racial minorities to systemic oppression rather than biological factors.
Critics have labeled her conclusions as speculative and lacking in scientific rigor—a sentiment echoed by conservative commentators who are increasingly concerned about the politicization of research.
The situation grows more egregious when you consider the scale of taxpayer funding involved.
Over the last twenty years, Manly has received grants exceeding $100 million from federal sources like the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Just recently, the NIH allocated nearly $700,000 to a project linking perceived racism with dementia risks, a point that raises eyebrows among many who question the direction of federal funding under successive regimes.
The Trump administration's recent move to revoke federal financial support to institutions that tolerate anti-Semitism is a strong step toward accountability.
By putting the spotlight on institutions like Columbia, the administration aims to dismantle the funding pipeline that sustains radicalized academic agendas.
In a time when hateful rhetoric towards Jewish communities is unsettling, it's critical that federal resources are not used to validate or promote such ideologies.
The administration has vowed to continue its efforts to investigate and eliminate funding from institutions that promote activism masquerading as scholarship.
Clearly, the focus must return to authentic research that serves the public good.
As we navigate this chaotic landscape, it is imperative to scrutinize how taxpayer dollars are being utilized in academia and to ensure that funding reflects American values of integrity and respect for all citizens.
Sources:
city-journal.org
theepochtimes.com
toddstarnes.com
Latest News