Trudeau Government Escapes Accountability in Vaccine Mandate Ruling
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 44 days ago
**Accountability Eroded: Canadian Court Shields Trudeau Government in Vaccine Passport Mandate Controversy**
In a troubling turn for civil liberties, a Canadian court has permitted the Trudeau government to evade scrutiny regarding its controversial vaccine passport mandates.
This decision, heavily criticized by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, highlights a systemic failure to hold government accountable for policies that many believe have trampled on fundamental rights.
Lawyer Chris Fleury, representing the affected individuals, expressed a mix of relief and disappointment, emphasizing that while this ruling is a victory for his clients, it denies a critical opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of the ArriveCAN app and its associated mandates.
The ArriveCAN app, originally implemented as a tool to monitor vaccination status during the pandemic, has faced scrutiny for both its exorbitant costs, which ballooned from a projected $80,000 to $60 million, and its questionable effectiveness. The High Court's decision to drop charges against four Canadians who refused to comply with the app’s demands not only raises questions about governmental overreach but also signals a reluctance on the part of the judiciary to test the app's constitutionality.
This situation echoes a broader trend seen across various governments globally—wherein health mandates introduced during the pandemic are increasingly criticized as inappropriate overreaches. The fact that these mandates could evade judicial examination suggests a disturbing precedent for the future of personal freedoms and governmental accountability.
Critics are quick to point out that this is yet another manifestation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration prioritizing control over the rights of citizens. The initial outrage over the financial mismanagement associated with the ArriveCAN app, which has been marred by technical failures and privacy concerns, underscores the public's demand for transparency and accountability in government.
The reaction from those who resisted these mandates has resonated with freedom advocates throughout North America who are wary of further erosions of personal liberties under the guise of public health.
As Canadians grapple with the implications of this ruling, it serves as a stark reminder that accountability must be demanded at every level of government.
The failure to challenge the unscientific and allegedly irrational quarantine mandates associated with the app raises critical questions about the future of civil liberties in Canada and the potential for similar government overreach in other countries.
In a time when many are advocating for a return to personal freedom and responsibility, the ramifications of this ruling could set a dangerous precedent for how governmental actions are held accountable in the COVID-19 era and beyond.
Sources:
reclaimthenet.org
thewrap.com
algemeiner.com
In a troubling turn for civil liberties, a Canadian court has permitted the Trudeau government to evade scrutiny regarding its controversial vaccine passport mandates.
This decision, heavily criticized by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, highlights a systemic failure to hold government accountable for policies that many believe have trampled on fundamental rights.
Lawyer Chris Fleury, representing the affected individuals, expressed a mix of relief and disappointment, emphasizing that while this ruling is a victory for his clients, it denies a critical opportunity to challenge the constitutionality of the ArriveCAN app and its associated mandates.
The ArriveCAN app, originally implemented as a tool to monitor vaccination status during the pandemic, has faced scrutiny for both its exorbitant costs, which ballooned from a projected $80,000 to $60 million, and its questionable effectiveness. The High Court's decision to drop charges against four Canadians who refused to comply with the app’s demands not only raises questions about governmental overreach but also signals a reluctance on the part of the judiciary to test the app's constitutionality.
This situation echoes a broader trend seen across various governments globally—wherein health mandates introduced during the pandemic are increasingly criticized as inappropriate overreaches. The fact that these mandates could evade judicial examination suggests a disturbing precedent for the future of personal freedoms and governmental accountability.
Critics are quick to point out that this is yet another manifestation of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration prioritizing control over the rights of citizens. The initial outrage over the financial mismanagement associated with the ArriveCAN app, which has been marred by technical failures and privacy concerns, underscores the public's demand for transparency and accountability in government.
The reaction from those who resisted these mandates has resonated with freedom advocates throughout North America who are wary of further erosions of personal liberties under the guise of public health.
As Canadians grapple with the implications of this ruling, it serves as a stark reminder that accountability must be demanded at every level of government.
The failure to challenge the unscientific and allegedly irrational quarantine mandates associated with the app raises critical questions about the future of civil liberties in Canada and the potential for similar government overreach in other countries.
In a time when many are advocating for a return to personal freedom and responsibility, the ramifications of this ruling could set a dangerous precedent for how governmental actions are held accountable in the COVID-19 era and beyond.
Sources:
reclaimthenet.org
thewrap.com
algemeiner.com
Latest News