Bragg's Office Misconduct Undermines Justice for Daniel Penny
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 4 hours ago
**Injustice** appears to thrive in the corridors of power, particularly under the watch of District Attorney Alvin Bragg.
Marine veteran Daniel Penny recently walked free after a jury acquitted him of criminal charges in the death of a homeless man who had threatened subway passengers.
Yet, as this case unfolded, evidence emerged indicating potential misconduct and collusion involving Bragg’s office.
Penny was initially charged with second-degree manslaughter following the death of Jordan Neely, who exhibited erratic behavior on a New York City subway.
In an act of self-defense and to protect others, Penny placed Neely in a chokehold until the threat was neutralized.
After the jury failed to reach a consensus on the manslaughter charge, it became clear that the prosecution was scrambling for a conviction.
Bragg’s office then sought to have the more serious charge dropped and aimed for a lesser charge instead.
Ultimately, jurors exonerated Penny, validating his assertion that he had no regrets about his actions.
Following the trial, Penny’s defense team expressed serious concerns over the handling of the case, suggesting that Bragg blurred ethical lines from the start.
Defense attorney Steven Raiser hinted at a malicious prosecution lawsuit against Bragg, alleging that collusion existed between the District Attorney and the medical examiner involved.
Such claims raise critical questions about the motives behind the charges and the integrity of the judicial process.
In a society that prides itself on justice and fairness, actions like these sow distrust among the citizenry.
Penny's ordeal underscores the broader issue of how well-meaning individuals can become victims of a system that may prioritize political agendas over truth and justice.
As more voices join the call for accountability, it remains to be seen whether the political elite will answer for their actions or continue to evade scrutiny.
The American people are watching closely as this situation develops, and many are left wondering about the implications for future cases involving self-defense and the rights of citizens to protect themselves.
Sources:
yahoo.com
patriotpost.us
foxnews.com
Marine veteran Daniel Penny recently walked free after a jury acquitted him of criminal charges in the death of a homeless man who had threatened subway passengers.
Yet, as this case unfolded, evidence emerged indicating potential misconduct and collusion involving Bragg’s office.
Penny was initially charged with second-degree manslaughter following the death of Jordan Neely, who exhibited erratic behavior on a New York City subway.
In an act of self-defense and to protect others, Penny placed Neely in a chokehold until the threat was neutralized.
After the jury failed to reach a consensus on the manslaughter charge, it became clear that the prosecution was scrambling for a conviction.
Bragg’s office then sought to have the more serious charge dropped and aimed for a lesser charge instead.
Ultimately, jurors exonerated Penny, validating his assertion that he had no regrets about his actions.
Following the trial, Penny’s defense team expressed serious concerns over the handling of the case, suggesting that Bragg blurred ethical lines from the start.
Defense attorney Steven Raiser hinted at a malicious prosecution lawsuit against Bragg, alleging that collusion existed between the District Attorney and the medical examiner involved.
Such claims raise critical questions about the motives behind the charges and the integrity of the judicial process.
In a society that prides itself on justice and fairness, actions like these sow distrust among the citizenry.
Penny's ordeal underscores the broader issue of how well-meaning individuals can become victims of a system that may prioritize political agendas over truth and justice.
As more voices join the call for accountability, it remains to be seen whether the political elite will answer for their actions or continue to evade scrutiny.
The American people are watching closely as this situation develops, and many are left wondering about the implications for future cases involving self-defense and the rights of citizens to protect themselves.
Sources:
yahoo.com
patriotpost.us
foxnews.com
Latest News