Pennsylvania Court Shields Woke DA from Accountability
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 2 hours ago
**Unjust Ruling: Pennsylvania Supreme Court Protects Woke Prosecutor from Accountability**
In a disheartening ruling for law and order advocates, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed an impeachment effort aimed at Philadelphia's District Attorney, Larry Krasner.
This decision not only undermines the attempts by Republican lawmakers to hold Krasner accountable for his handling of crime in the city but also signals a troubling trend of politicizing the judicial system in favor of progressive policies.
The court, dominated by Democrat justices, ruled that the impeachment efforts were flawed due to procedural issues arising from their being divided across two legislative sessions. Chief Justice Debra Todd's opinion stated that the earliest articles of impeachment must be resolved in the same legislative session in which they were issued.
Despite the evident failures of Krasner’s administration—known for its relaxed approach to crime—Republicans’ legislative efforts to address these concerns have been thwarted. They attempted to impeach Krasner after witnessing a surge in crime that has devastated communities and eroded public safety. Their efforts in the Pennsylvania House were not without controversy, as they passed along strict party lines, further highlighting the stark divide over public safety in the region.
State Rep. Craig Williams, who led the impeachment charge, expressed disappointment over the court's decision, asserting that it evaded the critical discussions surrounding Krasner's conduct. He emphasized the need for clarity regarding whether Krasner's actions constituted "misbehavior in office," a question the court chose to sidestep entirely.
This ruling represents more than just a setback for Republican legislators; it signifies a broader commitment from leftist factions to insulate progressive officials from accountability. Krasner, who has garnered financial backing from figures like George Soros, celebrated the court's decision as a victory for “democracy,” dismissing the impeachment attempts as undemocratic.
Such rhetoric rings hollow in the face of rising crime rates and an increasingly hostile environment for law-abiding citizens. Public trust in the justice system erodes further when enduring failures are met with judicial protection rather than corrective measures.
For those who prioritize community safety and accountability, the ruling serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle against a justice system that appears more devoted to the protection of its own than to the citizens it is meant to serve.
Sources:
conservativeinstitute.org
lewrockwell.com
rumble.com
In a disheartening ruling for law and order advocates, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed an impeachment effort aimed at Philadelphia's District Attorney, Larry Krasner.
This decision not only undermines the attempts by Republican lawmakers to hold Krasner accountable for his handling of crime in the city but also signals a troubling trend of politicizing the judicial system in favor of progressive policies.
The court, dominated by Democrat justices, ruled that the impeachment efforts were flawed due to procedural issues arising from their being divided across two legislative sessions. Chief Justice Debra Todd's opinion stated that the earliest articles of impeachment must be resolved in the same legislative session in which they were issued.
Despite the evident failures of Krasner’s administration—known for its relaxed approach to crime—Republicans’ legislative efforts to address these concerns have been thwarted. They attempted to impeach Krasner after witnessing a surge in crime that has devastated communities and eroded public safety. Their efforts in the Pennsylvania House were not without controversy, as they passed along strict party lines, further highlighting the stark divide over public safety in the region.
State Rep. Craig Williams, who led the impeachment charge, expressed disappointment over the court's decision, asserting that it evaded the critical discussions surrounding Krasner's conduct. He emphasized the need for clarity regarding whether Krasner's actions constituted "misbehavior in office," a question the court chose to sidestep entirely.
This ruling represents more than just a setback for Republican legislators; it signifies a broader commitment from leftist factions to insulate progressive officials from accountability. Krasner, who has garnered financial backing from figures like George Soros, celebrated the court's decision as a victory for “democracy,” dismissing the impeachment attempts as undemocratic.
Such rhetoric rings hollow in the face of rising crime rates and an increasingly hostile environment for law-abiding citizens. Public trust in the justice system erodes further when enduring failures are met with judicial protection rather than corrective measures.
For those who prioritize community safety and accountability, the ruling serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing battle against a justice system that appears more devoted to the protection of its own than to the citizens it is meant to serve.
Sources:
conservativeinstitute.org
lewrockwell.com
rumble.com
Latest News