Supreme Court's Ruling Disregards Rule of Law
Submitted by MAGA
Posted 22 days ago
**Chaotic Judicial Rulings Undermine Rule of Law**
In a troubling decision, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that illegal aliens, such as Hugo Monsalvo Velázquez, are to be granted extensions on their voluntary departure dates if they fall on weekends or holidays.
This ruling defies common sense and further complicates an already chaotic immigration landscape.
Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the majority opinion, bending the interpretation of immigration law to accommodate the convenience of individuals who do not respect the legal requirements established by Congress.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett argued against this apparent rewriting of the law, emphasizing that a "60-day" departure period should indeed mean exactly that: 60 days—no matter when it concludes.
Justice Alito bluntly stated, “Saturday is a day of the week, and there is no reason why petitioner could not have left the country on or before that date.”
Many Americans are left wondering why the judicial system continues to show leniency toward those who disregard the rule of law while making life difficult for law-abiding citizens.
This ruling comes at a crucial time when the nation is grappling with high levels of illegal immigration and a system that often favors those who circumvent legal pathways.
The justices’ decision to extend deadlines for deportable aliens creates further complications in an immigration framework that urgently needs reform and clarity.
On the other hand, this ruling serves as a wake-up call for lawmakers and lawmakers-in-training to solidify the enforcement of immigration laws rather than bending them for individual convenience.
With Donald Trump at the helm, there is an opportunity to champion immigration policies that prioritize legal entry and uphold the rule of law as a bedrock of American democracy.
As the nation looks ahead, the implications of this ruling could be detrimental to efforts aimed at securing borders and protecting the interests of American citizens.
It’s time for lawmakers to take action to ensure that similar judicial overreach does not undermine their attempts to establish a functional and fair immigration system.
Sources:
cato.org
independentsentinel.com
100percentfedup.com
In a troubling decision, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that illegal aliens, such as Hugo Monsalvo Velázquez, are to be granted extensions on their voluntary departure dates if they fall on weekends or holidays.
This ruling defies common sense and further complicates an already chaotic immigration landscape.
Justice Neil Gorsuch authored the majority opinion, bending the interpretation of immigration law to accommodate the convenience of individuals who do not respect the legal requirements established by Congress.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett argued against this apparent rewriting of the law, emphasizing that a "60-day" departure period should indeed mean exactly that: 60 days—no matter when it concludes.
Justice Alito bluntly stated, “Saturday is a day of the week, and there is no reason why petitioner could not have left the country on or before that date.”
Many Americans are left wondering why the judicial system continues to show leniency toward those who disregard the rule of law while making life difficult for law-abiding citizens.
This ruling comes at a crucial time when the nation is grappling with high levels of illegal immigration and a system that often favors those who circumvent legal pathways.
The justices’ decision to extend deadlines for deportable aliens creates further complications in an immigration framework that urgently needs reform and clarity.
On the other hand, this ruling serves as a wake-up call for lawmakers and lawmakers-in-training to solidify the enforcement of immigration laws rather than bending them for individual convenience.
With Donald Trump at the helm, there is an opportunity to champion immigration policies that prioritize legal entry and uphold the rule of law as a bedrock of American democracy.
As the nation looks ahead, the implications of this ruling could be detrimental to efforts aimed at securing borders and protecting the interests of American citizens.
It’s time for lawmakers to take action to ensure that similar judicial overreach does not undermine their attempts to establish a functional and fair immigration system.
Sources:
cato.org
independentsentinel.com
100percentfedup.com
Latest News